Whistleblower wonders why Dr. Farid Fata was not charged with fraud sooner

Published On: Dec 24 2013 09:34:14 AM EST   Updated On: Oct 02 2013 09:02:11 PM EDT

This nurse says she knew about the cancer doctor's fraud scheme years before he was formally charged.


When family members of gone but not forgotten patients celebrated outside of federal court after Dr. Farid Fata was denied bond, yet again, oncology nurse Angela Swantek was there celebrating, too.

Three years ago she lodged a formal complaint against Dr. Fata after interviewing for a job at one of his facilities, doing a job shadow and seeing what she called "horrifying" indications that he was running a chemo mill for profit, not for care.

She filed a formal complaint with the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs in Lansing and after a year received a formal letter saying after a thorough investigation nothing out of the ordinary was found. The case would be dropped.

On Wednesday, Fata was arraigned on even more charges of fraud. He’s been in jail since early August awaiting trial on those fraud charges as well as endangering the lives of his patients by prescribing unnecessary, overly aggressive and fraudulent chemotherapy to patients, some who apparently didn’t even have cancer.

Story: Cancer doc denied bond, headed to federal prison

Every day, nurse Swantek goes back to that letter she wrote three years ago and wonders how no one found anything sooner, even after she blew the whistle.

Late Wednesday afternoon after I requested a formal on-camera interview with the state investigator who looked into the Fata allegations lodged by nurse Swantek, I was told that the matter is confidential and no one will speak to me. When I reminded the state that the information is kept on record for five years to await other complaints, here's the response I received by email from Jeannie Vogel, Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) Office of Communications:

" ... since the allegation was closed without the filing of an administrative complaint, everything about the file is confidential pursuant to MCL 333.16238. We cannot discuss the details of the investigation or who was interviewed. Because the Public Health Code prohibits us from disclosing anything, there is no reason for an interview."


The views expressed below are not those of Click On Detroit, WDIV, or its affiliated companies. By clicking on "Post," you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and your comment is in compliance with such terms. Readers, please help keep this discussion respectful and on topic by flagging comments that are offensive or inappropriate (hover over the commenter's name and you'll see the flag option appear on right side of that line). And remember, respect goes both ways: Tolerance of others' opinions is important in a free discourse. If you're easily offended by strong opinions, you might skip reading comments entirely.

blog comments powered by Disqus