Michigan lottery winner waives key hearing in criminal case

Published On: May 22 2012 11:32:21 AM EDT
Updated On: May 22 2012 12:44:18 PM EDT

A Detroit-area woman who authorities say continued to get food stamps despite winning a Michigan lottery jackpot has waived a key court hearing

LINCOLN PARK, Mich. -

A Detroit-area woman who authorities say continued to get food stamps despite winning a Michigan lottery jackpot has waived a key court hearing.

Amanda Clayton is charged with failing to inform the state that her income had changed as a result of the lottery prize and a job. The 25-year-old from Lincoln Park won a $1 million jackpot on the game show "Make Me Rich!" and chose a $735,000 lump sum, before taxes, last September.

The Michigan attorney general's offices says Clayton waived her preliminary examination in Lincoln Park that was scheduled for Tuesday.

Amanda-Clayton

The hearing determines whether there's enough evidence for a case to go to trial.

She's now due for June 5 arraignment in Circuit Court in Detroit.

Local 4 Defenders revealed fraud in March

The case came to light when Local 4's Karen Drew confronted Clayton.

Amanda Clayton

"I thought that they would cut me off, but since they didn't, I thought maybe it was okay because I'm not working," Clayton told Local 4.  

Full investigation: Lottery winner still using Bridge card

Comments

The views expressed below are not those of Click On Detroit, WDIV, or its affiliated companies. By clicking on "Post," you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and your comment is in compliance with such terms. Readers, please help keep this discussion respectful and on topic by flagging comments that are offensive or inappropriate (hover over the commenter's name and you'll see the flag option appear on right side of that line). And remember, respect goes both ways: Tolerance of others' opinions is important in a free discourse. If you're easily offended by strong opinions, you might skip reading comments entirely.

blog comments powered by Disqus